Contact
Boston
Providence
August 12, 2016
CMS cracks down on “abuse” of nursing home residents via social media
In a memorandum targeting nursing homes but which could impact all health care providers, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) instructed state survey agencies to begin examining nursing home activities and policies concerning staff disclosure of confidential patient information, and possible mental abuse of residents, through postings and sharing on social media. Although this CMS initiative specifically targets nursing facilities, its focus on patient privacy and confidentiality, as well as the general concept of what it means to “abuse” a patient in today’s social media world, have implications for all health care organizations and personnel, including termination, loss of license to practice, and even criminal charges.
On Friday, August 5, 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a memorandum instructing state survey agencies to begin requesting and examining nursing home policies concerning social media as they relate to prohibition against resident abuse, staff training on abuse prevention, and appropriate facility responses to reports of abuse. State survey agencies are further authorized to investigate and report any on-site instances of noncompliance with federal requirements related to the inappropriate use of social media. This additional scrutiny was prompted by a ProPublica report detailing nearly fifty instances of inappropriate use of social media by nursing home workers. These incidents included photographs and video recordings of vulnerable nursing home residents that demeaned or humiliated residents and that were uploaded to Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat.
In its memorandum, CMS outlines the federal requirements implicated by such incidents, including nursing home residents’ rights to privacy and confidentiality under 42 C.F.R. § 483.10(e). Under this provision, taking unauthorized photographs or recordings of nursing home residents to keep or distribute on social media is a violation of federal law. For example, a resident with Alzheimer’s disease may be incapable of granting permission for a photograph to be taken, let alone posted on social media, even if it depicts the resident positively. More broadly, HIPAA prohibits the use or disclosure of individually identifiable information – that is, information about the individual’s condition, and provision of or payment for health care that identifies the individual or for which there is a reasonable basis to believe it can be used to identify the individual. See 45 C.F.R. § 160.103. Social media posts that omit the resident’s name or direct identifiers may still reasonably identify the resident based on other indicators or information, which, when taken together, would identify the resident to certain individuals (e.g., other staff members, residents, or family members). And health care workers must remember that HIPAA requires written authorization to disclose a resident’s protected health information. Only obtaining a resident’s verbal consent to having their picture taken and sent to others electronically or posted on social media would technically violate HIPAA.
CMS also states that photographing or recording a nursing home resident in a manner that demeans or humiliates the resident may constitute mental abuse under 42 C.F.R. § 483.13(b),(c). CMS interprets mental abuse to include humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment or deprivation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation as experienced from the perspective of a reasonable person. Under this interpretation, social media posts depicting residents in a certain manner, even those residents with no actual physical harm or with cognitive impairments, may constitute mental abuse, if a reasonable person would experience mental abuse under the same circumstances.
In addition to having policies and procedures prohibiting such abuse and violations of residents’ rights, nursing homes must also ensure that staff training is sufficient to educate all staff members, particularly with respect to staff responsibilities to report allegations of resident abuse. Staff members who observe social media posts involving residents must report these instances. Nursing home management must ensure that these allegations are reported, investigated, and that appropriate corrective action is taken. Therefore, policies and procedures must be adequately implemented to achieve the goals of abuse prevention and abuse reporting.
The CMS memorandum and directive to state survey agencies to curb patient abuse via social media is best understood within the context of the pending proposed update that would overhaul the regulations governing long-term care facilities, including nursing homes. See Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Reform of Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities, 80 Fed. Reg. 42,168 (July 16, 2015) (to be codified at 42 C.F.R. pts. 405, 431, 447, 482, 483, 485, and 488). Among other things, the proposed updated regulations would define “abuse” to include mental abuse “facilitated or enabled through the use of technology,” which would presumptively implicate posting to social media, in accordance with the CMS memorandum. 80 Fed. Reg. at 42,246. Furthermore, under the proposed update to the regulations, facilities are still required to develop and implement policies and procedures to prohibit, as well as prevent, such abuse. See 80 Fed. Reg. 42,253. The final rule is set to be promulgated no later than September 30, 2016.
Recommendation
While nursing facilities certainly need to address this pending scrutiny, all health care organizations and professionals would be well advised to review their policies and practices in light of the concerns raised in the CMS memorandum to ensure that they adequately address the impact of technology, particularly social media, on patient and resident abuse, as well as how technology and social media can result in violations of patient and resident privacy and confidentiality. Management should consider developing a dedicated social media policy, if the organization does not already have one, in furtherance of these federal requirements. Employers should also train or retrain their staffs on their institutional privacy policies, including existing technology or social media policies and the responsibility of staff to report policy violations.
Other Resources
Dept. Health & Human Servs., Ctrs. for Medicaid & Medicare Servs., Memorandum: S&C: 16-33-NH, Protecting Resident Privacy and Prohibiting Mental Abuse Related to Photographs and Audio/Video Recordings by Nursing Home Staff (August 5, 2016), https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/Downloads/Survey-and-Cert-Letter-16-33.pdf.
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Reform of Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities, 80 Fed. Reg. 42,168 (July 16, 2015) (to be codified at 42 C.F.R. pts. 405, 431, 447, 482, 483, 485, and 488), https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-07-16/pdf/2015-17207.pdf.
Charles Ornstein & Jessica Huseman, Inappropriate Social Media Posts by Nursing Home Workers, Detailed, ProPublica.org (Dec. 21, 2015, 8 a.m.), https://www.propublica.org/article/inappropriate-social-media-posts-by-nursing-home-workers-detailed.
American Health Care Association (AHCA), Best Practices for Social Media at Your Skilled Nursing Center or Assisted Living Community, https://www.ahcancal.org/News/Documents/SocialMediaBestPractices.pdf.
American Health Care Association (AHCA), Memorandum, Social Media Guidance for Nursing Care Centers and Assisted Living Communities (June 10, 2016), https://www.careproviders.org/members/2016/2016SocialMediaGuidance.pdf.
Dept. Health & Human Servs., Office of Inspector General (OIG), Letter to Senator Charles E. Grassley (March 15, 2016), http://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/constituents/nursing%20homes%203-15-16%20response%20from%20HHS%20OIG%20on%20nursing%20home%20abuse%20using%20social%20media.pdf (responding to Senator Grassley’s six questions about the quality of elder care and preventing abuse).
Kyna Veatch, A Checklist For Avoiding HIPAA Violations On Social Media, Law360.com (January 7, 2016, 11:01 AM), http://www.law360.com/articles/743560/a-checklist-for-avoiding-hipaa-violations-on-social-media.
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), The Nurse’s Guide to the Use of Social Media (2011), https://www.ncsbn.org/NCSBN_SocialMedia.pdf.
About the Author
Donoghue Barrett & Singal clerk Yelena Greenberg contributed to this post.
Sign up for email alerts
© 2021 | website: visual dialogue
News
Health Law
-
August 27, 2020
Best Lawyers in America® 2021 Recognizes Summit Health Law Partners Attorneys
-
June 03, 2020
Adelita Orefice, Esq. Honored by Rhode Island Monthly
-
April 17, 2020
Healthcare fraud warning from the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney arising out of COVID-19
-
April 10, 2020
Financial Solutions for Small Businesses Disrupted by COVID-19
-
March 26, 2020
Massachusetts and the Federal Government Expand Telemedicine Services and Coverage in Response to COVID-19
-
March 23, 2020
COVID-19 Update for Our Clients
-
August 27, 2019
Best Lawyers in America® 2020 Recognizes Summit Health Law Partners Attorneys
-
November 06, 2018
Sweeping New Opioid Law Extends Anti-Kickback Liability to Private Insurance Market in Three Areas
-
November 05, 2018
Adelita Orefice Earns Certification in Healthcare Compliance
-
October 22, 2018
Super Lawyers® Recognizes Summit Health Law Partners Attorneys
-
September 18, 2018
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
DPH releases proposed amendments to Determination of Need regulation
-
August 20, 2018
| Robert Blaisdell
Governor Baker Signs Sweeping Reform on Employee non-Competition Agreements Law
-
August 15, 2018
Best Lawyers in America® recognizes Summit Health Law Partners attorneys for their excellence in law.
-
October 24, 2017
| Jeffrey Chase-Lubitz
Legal Issues and the Aging Physician
-
October 11, 2017
| Andrew Levine
Department of Public Health Presentation on DoN Regulations
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
July 20, 2017
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that terminating an employee for using medical marijuana may constitute handicap discrimination.
-
February 16, 2017
| Diane Moes
The ACA May Be in Jeopardy, but MACRA Isn’t Likely to Go Away
-
January 16, 2017
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom
DPH Adopts New Determination of Need Regulations
-
November 09, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
UPDATE: Preliminary Injunction Temporarily Halts Implementation of Final Rule Prohibiting Pre-Dispute Arbitration Contracts in LTC Facilities
-
October 24, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
UPDATE: Nursing Facilities Sue HHS to Block Ban on Pre-Dispute Binding Arbitration Agreements
-
October 17, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
HHS Prohibits Long-Term Care Facilities from Using Pre-Dispute Binding Arbitration Agreements
-
August 31, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Massachusetts Enacts Equal Pay Act: What employers can do now to prepare for its implementation
-
August 29, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom
Massachusetts Department of Public Health Announces Major Determination of Need Regulatory Reform Initiative
-
August 29, 2016
New MA Prescription Monitoring Program Goes Live August 22, 2016
-
August 15, 2016
| Crystal Bloom, Amanda Beauregard
OPPS 2017 – Implementation of Section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015
-
July 20, 2016
| Kelly McGee, Adelita Orefice
Rhode Island Prohibits Physician Non-Competes
-
June 28, 2016
Massachusetts Trial Court Dismisses Wrongful Employment Termination Claim Based on Medical Marijuana Use
-
May 17, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Noncompliance with Security Deposit Law Could Be a Defense to Eviction
-
April 19, 2016
| Crystal Bloom
Update Regarding DPH Increased Oversight of Long-Term Care Facilities
-
April 11, 2016
| Crystal Bloom
DPH Strengthens Oversight of Long-Term Care Facilities
-
March 23, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Andrew Ferrer
Governor Baker Signs Legislation Designed To Address Opioid Crisis
-
March 23, 2016
| Kelly McGee
Phase 2 HIPAA Compliance Audits Set To Begin
-
March 22, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Failure to execute HIPAA business associate agreement and conduct risk analysis costs health system $1.55M
-
February 11, 2016
| Kelly McGee
Proposed Rule Modifies 42 CFR Part 2, the Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records Regulations
-
November 16, 2015
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Nicole Sexton
Medicare Hospital Reimbursement Changes
-
October 26, 2015
Diane Moes named one of Mass Lawyers Weekly’s “Top Women of Law”
-
June 12, 2015
OIG Fraud Alert Warns Doctors That They Will Be Personally Accountable for Violations of Federal Anti-Kickback Statute
-
May 15, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Long Term Care Facility Regulatory Update
-
April 23, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Department of Public Health - new process for the addition of licensed mobile or portable health care units
-
April 21, 2015
| Paul Barrett, Jeffrey Chase-Lubitz
OIG Releases Compliance And Oversight Guide for Healthcare Boards
-
April 20, 2015
| Andrew Levine,
Massachusetts Department of Public Health Revamps Application Process for Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
-
April 16, 2015
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
Proposed Legislation Will Increase Legal Authority of Health Policy Commission and Attorney General
-
March 15, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Health Policy Commission Releases Proposed Regulation Concerning Nurse-to-Patient Ratios | Public hearings scheduled for late March and early April
-
March 06, 2015
| Robert Blaisdell
Court Holds Officers and Directors of Non-Profit Healthcare Facility Personally Liable to Creditors for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
-
September 17, 2014
| Andrew Levine, Robert Blaisdell, Kathleen Harrell
Legal Issues Associated with MA Registered Marijuana Dispensaries: An article by Andrew Levine, Robert Blaisdell, and Kathleen Harrell
-
July 14, 2014
| Andrew Levine
Important Compounding Pharmacy Law Empowers Board of Registration in Pharmacy
-
June 20, 2014
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
Public Health Council Approves Amendments to Determination of Need Regulations
-
June 03, 2014
| Diane Moes
U.S. District Court Ruling Vacating HRSA’s 340B Program Orphan Drug Exclusion Rule Casts Uncertainty on Forthcoming "Mega-Rule"
-
May 28, 2014
| Andrew Levine
New Guidelines for Dementia Special Care Unit Regulations
-
January 10, 2014
| Andrew Levine
MassHealth Changes regulations to comply with Affordable Care Act
Litigation
-
August 27, 2020
Best Lawyers in America® 2021 Recognizes Summit Health Law Partners Attorneys
-
May 12, 2020
First Federal Indictment Arising Out of Fraudulent Applications for Paycheck Protection Program Loans Highlights Focus on COVID-19 Related Investigations
-
April 30, 2020
Impact of COVID-19 on Reporting Foreign Components
-
March 27, 2020
| Michelle Peirce
Scam Warning for Massachusetts Physicians
-
August 27, 2019
Best Lawyers in America® 2020 Recognizes Summit Health Law Partners Attorneys
-
October 22, 2018
Super Lawyers® Recognizes Summit Health Law Partners Attorneys
-
August 15, 2018
Best Lawyers in America® recognizes Summit Health Law Partners attorneys for their excellence in law.
-
April 05, 2018
In Russia probe, the difference between ‘target’ and ‘subject’ matters a great deal
-
February 22, 2018
Landmark Supreme Court Decision Substantially Narrows the Applicability of the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
July 20, 2017
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that terminating an employee for using medical marijuana may constitute handicap discrimination.
-
August 31, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Massachusetts Enacts Equal Pay Act: What employers can do now to prepare for its implementation
-
June 28, 2016
3 Things Every Massachusetts Podiatrist Should Know About the Proposed Amendments to Podiatry Regulations
-
June 01, 2016
How Recent Changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “White Collar” Exemptions May Affect Your Small Business
-
March 25, 2015
Avoiding Securities Fraud Prosecution: Using the SEC’s 2015 examination priorities as a compliance roadmap when dealing with retail investors.
-
December 29, 2014
| Bruce Singal
Was the Ferguson grand jury rigged?
-
March 26, 2014
Employer Avoids Discrimination Trial Thanks to Robust Investigation and Documentation Policies
-
February 13, 2014
| Michelle Peirce
Shielding Companies Against Whistleblower Suits
-
March 01, 2010
Trials Facing Women Litigators and Tips For Success: Michelle Peirce
-
“Official Immunity” for Private Research Institutions: How a recent federal court decision impacts civil tort lawsuits arising out of research misconduct inquiries / investigations.
-
Research Misconduct Penalties and How to Avoid Them
Corporate
-
August 20, 2018
| Robert Blaisdell
Governor Baker Signs Sweeping Reform on Employee non-Competition Agreements Law
-
March 16, 2018
Massachusetts Equal Pay Act: 5 Things Every Employer Should Do Before It Takes Effect On July 1, 2018
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
June 28, 2016
Massachusetts Trial Court Dismisses Wrongful Employment Termination Claim Based on Medical Marijuana Use
-
June 28, 2016
3 Things Every Massachusetts Podiatrist Should Know About the Proposed Amendments to Podiatry Regulations
Research Misconduct
-
May 18, 2020
Why Grantees Must be Prepared for Heightened Scrutiny of Conflicts of Interest in Foreign Support for US Research
-
March 23, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Andrew Ferrer
Governor Baker Signs Legislation Designed To Address Opioid Crisis
-
What is Research Misconduct and Why Should I Care?
-
“Official Immunity” for Private Research Institutions: How a recent federal court decision impacts civil tort lawsuits arising out of research misconduct inquiries / investigations.
-
Research Misconduct Penalties and How to Avoid Them
This website presents general information about Barrett & Singal and is not intended as legal advice nor should you consider it as such. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
Please note that contacting Barrett & Singal by email, telephone or facsimile will not establish an attorney-client relationship, obligate us to act as your attorney or impose an obligation on either the law firm or the receiving lawyer to keep the transmitted information confidential. Completion of Barrett & Singal’s new client intake protocol, including without limitation the firm’s conflicts checking process and an engagement letter, is necessary to establish an attorney-client relationship. Absent a current attorney-client relationship with Barrett & Singal, any information or documents communicated or transmitted by you to Barrett & Singal will not be treated as confidential, secret or protected in any way. If you are not a current client of Barrett & Singal, please do not send any confidential information to us through this web site or otherwise concerning any potential or actual legal matter you have. Before providing any confidential information to us, you must obtain permission to do so from one of the firm’s lawyers. By clicking "Accept," you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us unless we already represent you or unless we have agreed to receive limited confidential material/information from you as a prospective client.
If you would like to discuss becoming a client, please contact one of our attorneys to arrange for a meeting or telephone conference. If you wish to disclose confidential information to a lawyer in the firm before an attorney-client relationship is established, the protections that the law firm will provide to such information from a prospective client should be discussed with the firm attorney before such information is submitted. Thank you for your interest in Barrett & Singal.